Search This Blog

Saturday, February 25, 2012

OAP


Currently there is a lot of fear over what is to become of Canada’s OAP (Old Age Pension).
Certainly, with his involvement in the bail out of Greece, I can understand Harper’s fears of Canada falling into a similar situation.
However, unlike Greece, Canada has many ways to prevent such a disaster.
One of the fears is, where will we get the money for all the forthcoming pensioners?  Well, for one we shouldn’t reduce the number of years required to become eligible. I am talking about the mandate that requires a new citizen to be a resident for 10 years. Now they want to reduce that to 3 years. That alone will triple the number of new pensioners.  This should be reversed. To reduce the number of pensioners increase the requirement to 20 years or better yet, to be eligible a person must have been born in Canada.
Finding sufficient funds is not a problem, just reduce, or do away with, the extravagant pension that was recently awarded to members of Parliament.
They certainly haven’t done anything, or been on the job long enough, to deserve a pension.  In any other business an employee has to be with the company for 20 years.  Why should they, or a new comer to Canada, be in line for a pension after only 3 years?

SECURITY & VEILS


Lately there has been a lot of controversy about Muslim women removing their face cover at customs check ins.
How did these women get passports or other photo ID if they didn’t remove their niqab for the photographer?
And how is any Gov’t official supposed to compare the passport, or photo ID, if they don’t have a face to compare it to.
It could be a man beneath all those robes.
Obviously, (no pun intended) unless technology has advanced retina scanning to the point of perfection, a person, any person, regardless of race, or religion, must bare their  face, to any officer of the law, to confirm identification.