Last night at work (The Killing) I mentioned to a fellow driver that there was no point in voting for NDP because they won't promise to bring back our seniority.
He replied, "You can't bring it back. It is gone. it is law."
Well, isn't that the whole point of electing a new Government, to change the law.
That's what governments do. They; make, break, and change laws.
The whole point of electing a new government is to get rid of the old laws that we don't like and get new laws that we do like.
However no new government is going to change the laws if we don't tell them which ones we want changed and how we want them changed.
Invariably we elect new officials to office and the reason we elect them is to undo the laws the previous officials had made. But they never change them.
Why, because they are too busy with their own agenda.
Now, during the pre election campaign trail, is when we need to tell them what we want.
We have to make them realize that if they want our vote, they need to put our agenda ahead of theirs.
That is what democracy is about.
It isn't important that you go to the meetings, and rallies, of a particular party.
You need to go to every rally and every meeting of every candidate, of every party.
You need to use; mail, E mail, phone calls, meetings, whatever it takes, to impress upon, ALL, candidates, regardless of their party affiliation, that if they want your vote they have to promise to do what you want when they get in power.
If the last party passed a law saying your union can not dispatch according to seniority then you must tell all candidates that you want that law rescinded and then vote for the cnadidate that promises to do so, regardless of what party he is a member of.
That my friends is how democracy works.
A collection of articles, and photographs, some excerpts from my websites called Bear's Page and Lee's Page. My thoughts and experiences are many and I am constantly adding to the different areas; Articles, Diving, Fero (A Novel), Film Industry, Film Industry Pictionary, Humour, Interviews, Lasagna, Life, Real Estate, Sharing, Surveys, Travel, Trucking, Trucking Glossary, Vacation rental, Vancouver Seawall, Etc.
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label NDP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NDP. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
DO THE LIBERALS PROFIT FROM HST?
When I see the extent to which the Liberals are conniving to keep the HST in play it makes me wonder how much of that goes in their pockets.
Despite the fact that it is obvious British Columbians do not want the HST, nor do we want it replaced with GST & PST, none of the political parties are promising to get rid of it if we vote other than Liberal in the next election.
What do the NDP, Conservatives, and other parties know that we don’t know. How much of this tax goes directly to their party, or their own pocket, once elected to office?
Campbell made a big issue of how the HST had brought back the film Industry (that he destroyed). I ask you, if the HST brought it back, why isn’t it still here? The HST is still here.
They say it will cost the tax payers a lot of money to switch back to the old ST system. I never heard them saying anything about it costing us to switch from the old to the new.
They say if we switch back we will have to pay back Ottawa. Why? Did we borrow money from Ottawa to pay for the cost of switching from PST to HST? Did Ottawa pay us to switch over? If so where is my share? If the Liberals were paid to switch then the Liberals can refund the money when we switch back.
The Liberals say that if we keep the HST they will reduce it by 2%. That’s a pretty generous offer considering we want them to lower it by 12%.
Altogether there is just too much persuasion, too much pressure, too many promises. Me thinks there is something fishy going on here.
Regardless of this smoke screen they call a referendum, I think the main battle is in the next election and we need a party who will stand up and promise to get rid of the ST if they are elected.
No ST (H, G, or P) would mean fewer British Columbians running across the borders, East and South, to do their shopping. It would mean more shoppers from Alberta and Washington coming to B. C. It would result in; more businesses moving in, and increased tourism.
There is no possible way that losing the ST would harm the province or cost the tax payers anything. It would, on the other hand, create more employment.
Losing the ST (G, H, & P) is a win win situation.
And giving in to the will of the people would only make the Liberals look good in the eyes of the voters. So why are they so adamant to lose public support?
Despite the fact that it is obvious British Columbians do not want the HST, nor do we want it replaced with GST & PST, none of the political parties are promising to get rid of it if we vote other than Liberal in the next election.
What do the NDP, Conservatives, and other parties know that we don’t know. How much of this tax goes directly to their party, or their own pocket, once elected to office?
Campbell made a big issue of how the HST had brought back the film Industry (that he destroyed). I ask you, if the HST brought it back, why isn’t it still here? The HST is still here.
They say it will cost the tax payers a lot of money to switch back to the old ST system. I never heard them saying anything about it costing us to switch from the old to the new.
They say if we switch back we will have to pay back Ottawa. Why? Did we borrow money from Ottawa to pay for the cost of switching from PST to HST? Did Ottawa pay us to switch over? If so where is my share? If the Liberals were paid to switch then the Liberals can refund the money when we switch back.
The Liberals say that if we keep the HST they will reduce it by 2%. That’s a pretty generous offer considering we want them to lower it by 12%.
Altogether there is just too much persuasion, too much pressure, too many promises. Me thinks there is something fishy going on here.
Regardless of this smoke screen they call a referendum, I think the main battle is in the next election and we need a party who will stand up and promise to get rid of the ST if they are elected.
No ST (H, G, or P) would mean fewer British Columbians running across the borders, East and South, to do their shopping. It would mean more shoppers from Alberta and Washington coming to B. C. It would result in; more businesses moving in, and increased tourism.
There is no possible way that losing the ST would harm the province or cost the tax payers anything. It would, on the other hand, create more employment.
Losing the ST (G, H, & P) is a win win situation.
And giving in to the will of the people would only make the Liberals look good in the eyes of the voters. So why are they so adamant to lose public support?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)